Official tariff data and 2026 applicability
The release records the responsible authority, checks legal continuity and amendment coverage, and verifies tariff-line code structure, duplicates, blanks and current applicability.
The release records the responsible authority, checks legal continuity and amendment coverage, and verifies tariff-line code structure, duplicates, blanks and current applicability.
Specific and mixed duties are converted only when customs value, quantity, unit, currency and the legal duty formula are matched, independently reproducible and pass the stated unit-value checks.
The evidence sequence uses reporter data, prior years, partner-reported trade, global unit values and medians from comparable tariff lines. Each estimate records its method and limitations.
Each economy is summarized by tariff line, by six-digit HS product and by 22 product groups under Agricultural and Non-agricultural totals.
Open any economy to see its legal basis, source authority, AVE evidence and product-group detail. Select a column heading to sort. The displayed simple average combines direct ad-valorem rates and available non-AV AVEs; estimated AVEs are included and identified by method.
Data acquisition, legal verification, tariff classification, AVE calculation, estimation and product summaries.
Every reported tariff rate comes exclusively from the issuing government or a legally governing regional authority. World Tariff Profiles are used only for comparison and never supply, replace or imply a tariff rate. An official schedule may still be retained as a reference when it is old, incomplete or lacks evidence that it applies in 2026; it remains visibly marked “not validated for 2026.”
A current portal date, enacted instrument, explicit carry-forward clause, or complete official amendment chain must establish that the rates were in force at the release reference date, 28 August 2026. This is point-in-time validity, not a claim that every rate remained unchanged throughout the whole calendar year.
All operative tariff codes and rate scopes must be present. Parent headings, national subdivisions, duplicate printed rows and special Chapter 00/98 regimes are reviewed explicitly.
Missing rates are not filled from neighbouring lines, preferences, partner data or historical schedules merely to make a schedule appear complete.
If the legal chain or completeness evidence remains unresolved, classification statistics may be shown with a caution, but the economy remains not validated for 2026.
Every distinct coded tariff-line product or scope receives one primary category: duty-free, positive ad valorem, specific, compound, alternate/mixed, seasonal/range/conditional, prohibited, restricted/non-rate, other/untyped, or blank/unresolved. Quota, in-quota and out-of-quota status is recorded separately.
Duty-free and positive ad-valorem rates enter directly. For the formulas below, V is customs import value, Q is the matching quantity in the legal duty unit, d is the specific duty amount per q0 units, f converts the duty currency into the value currency, and t is an ad-valorem percentage. Every published operator is applied in its legal order.
The duty is converted into the value currency and divided by the exact customs value represented by the matching quantity.
Released example — Japan 110814091: the tariff is ¥119/kg. Customs recorded ¥33,805,000 and 255,000 kg in 2025, so 100 × 119 × 255,000 ÷ 33,805,000 = 89.7648%.
An ad-valorem component and a specific component are both payable, so their percentage incidences are added.
Accepted example — Canada 19012015: 8.5% + C$0.1193/kg; C$106,723,587 and 25,920,890 kg give a specific incidence of 2.8975%, hence 8.5 + 2.8975 = 11.3975%.
“Whichever is higher” uses the maximum; “whichever is lower” uses the minimum. A compound branch is assembled before comparison.
Released example — Austria 08081010: cider apples imported 16 September–15 December carry 7.2% with a minimum of €0.36/100 kg. The specific incidence from €16,912,335 and 70,300,083 kg is 1.4964%; the minimum rule therefore selects 7.2%.
The published base B, lower bound L and upper bound U are calculated separately, then applied in legal order.
Released example — Canada 02071191: C$1,446,556 ÷ 430,116 kg = C$3.3632/kg. The 4.74¢ floor is 1.4094%, the 9.48¢ cap is 2.8188%, and the base is 5%; clamping 5% to those bounds gives 2.8188%.
The date condition remains part of the tariff line. Periods are combined only when matching period-specific trade exists.
Released example — Austria 08081010: the 7.2%-minimum formula applies only to bulk cider apples imported from 16 September through 15 December. Its released 7.2% is attached to that dated scope, not silently averaged with another season.
Qc must be the quantity named by the law—litres of alcohol, kilograms of sugar, grams of lead or item count—not an unrelated net weight.
Released example — New Zealand 22072023: the tariff includes a charge per gram of lead. The trade source does not provide grams of lead, so no AVE using official tariff-line trade is calculated; the all-method series uses a flagged median estimate from comparable country and product lines of 99.7537%.
The duty amount is converted into the customs-value currency before incidence is calculated. The stored orientation is value-currency units per duty-currency unit, so it is never inferred by back-solving the AVE.
Sources: cross-currency AVEs based on official tariff-line trade use the documented official central-bank series (European Central Bank in this release). Estimated AVEs and the unit-value diagnostic use the World Bank period-average official exchange-rate series for the selected trade year, or an identified prior year. A factor of 1 for identical currencies is not treated as a separate exchange-rate observation.
Excluded official-trade example — Canada 07061031: the published compound rate gives 4.2230% from only C$801 and 190 kg. The observation is below the US$2,500 information threshold, so 4.2230% is retained in the audit data but excluded from the official-trade series; the all-method series uses the same-unit world HS6 estimate of 5.0230%.
Cross-year HS classifications, unit equivalence, combined customs territories and exchange rates are documented in the source and calculation notes. Missing inputs are not inferred from the resulting AVE.
Where an AVE using official tariff-line trade is unavailable, the all-method series selects the first estimate that passes the stated checks in a fixed evidence sequence. Each row below identifies the evidence used, its calculation and the exact formula. Qualifications concerning continuity, exchange rates and data quality are retained in the source and calculation notes. The original candidate, selected estimate and reason for exclusion remain separate so the decision can be reviewed.
Cyprus 22042910: the legal duty is €32/hl. National tariff-line trade was unavailable, so 2025 reporter HS6 evidence—US$1,956,204.195 and 2,219,900 litres—supplies the broader unit value. Converting euros with the recorded period-average factor and normalizing one hectolitre to 100 litres gives 39.3051%. The selected method is Reporter HS6 unit value — current year, not official tariff-line trade.
Turkmenistan 0202201000: reporter imports were unavailable. Two partners reported 2025 exports to Turkmenistan of US$78,653 and 26,970 kg. The duty and reported value are both in US dollars, so f = 1. Applying the published US$0.15/kg duty gives 5.1435%. The source and calculation notes identify the partner exports, HS6 aggregation, currency identity and use of partner-reported trade.
FOB/CIF sensitivity: partner exports are normally FOB while import values are normally CIF. A lower FOB unit value makes the AVE upward-biased, all else equal. No evidence-based line-specific CIF factor was available, so the selected estimate stays unadjusted. A separate illustrative 10% CIF uplift gives 5.1435 ÷ 1.10 = 4.6759%; it is not the selected AVE. See the UN trade-valuation convention.
Gibraltar 24011035: neither national tariff-line nor usable reporter HS6 trade was available. The 2025 median unit value from 39 positive country reporters is applied to the published £0.10/kg component, with the recorded GBP/USD conversion, producing 1.8532%. The denominator is global rather than Gibraltar trade.
Åland 01022910: the formula is 10.2% + €93.10/100 kg, but no territory-specific denominator is released. The log-scale median of 94 accepted comparable lines with the same normalized formula and product group gives 29.2778%. This estimates the whole AVE rather than a tariff-line unit value, and is identified as “median, exact formula”.
The strict official-only six-digit files use the same selected government tariff schedules as the country profiles. H4 denotes HS 2012, H5 denotes HS 2017 and H6 denotes HS 2022. These labels describe the target HS classification for the summary, not necessarily the classification printed in the original national schedule. The separately marked provisional extension described below does not meet the strict official-source standard and must be treated as an analytical scenario.
Each national tariff line contributes one percentage: zero for a duty-free line, its published percentage for a positive ad-valorem line, or the released line-level AVE for a non-ad-valorem duty. A line with no defensible percentage is excluded from the average but remains in the coverage counts.
The HS6 value is the arithmetic mean of the available national tariff-line percentages assigned to that six-digit product. It is not trade weighted. National subdivisions receive equal weight. Legally separate seasonal or product-scope lines remain separate observations; paired quota tiers are retained separately, but only the ordinary/out-of-quota tier contributes to the MFN line value.
Codes are converted with the official United Nations Statistics Division conversion and correlation tables. Correlation sheets are included so that unchanged codes are not lost. If a source does not declare its HS revision, the result is labelled “derived (UNSD concordance)” with match diagnostics; an ambiguous revision remains unresolved. Where a government tariff portal publishes a fuller product list than its rate results, that list may identify the HS revision but never supplies a tariff rate.
Coverage is reported with separate denominators. The diagnostics show: national tariff lines eligible for HS6 assignment; lines successfully assigned; distinct source HS6 codes represented; lines with a direct rate or released AVE; non-ad-valorem lines without an AVE; blank, prohibited and other non-rate lines; and target H4, H5 or H6 codes with a calculable average relative to the full standard universe—5,205 H4 codes, 5,387 H5 codes and 5,612 H6 codes. A schedule may therefore be fully acquired even though some HS6 averages are unavailable, and a concorded target file may contain fewer than all target HS6 codes without implying that tariff lines were omitted.
A published in-quota or out-of-quota AVE is a tier rate, not an effective blended rate. For the legal MFN series and its default simulation scalar, TINA uses the out-of-quota rate. This follows the WTO tariff-data convention, under which MFN tariffs for tariff quotas are the rates applied to quantities outside the quota. The published in-quota rate is retained as a separate scenario observation and is never averaged into the ordinary MFN rate merely because both tiers are printed in the schedule.
Swiss customs territory, HS6 010121: the in-quota line has CHF7,904,210 at 0.2702%; the out-of-quota line has CHF17,048 at 44.9789%. Their value-weighted incidence is (7,904,210 × 0.2702 + 17,048 × 44.9789) ÷ 7,921,258 = 0.3665%.
For the same basket, 178 in-quota units and 2 out-of-quota units give (178 × 0.2702 + 2 × 44.9789) ÷ 180 = 0.7670%. This differs from 0.3665% because quantity weighting assumes equal unit values across tiers, so it is a sensitivity rather than the primary estimate.
Observed effective incidence is released only as a separate analytical scenario. The hierarchy is: (1) disjoint tier customs values and duties, value-weighted; (2) disjoint tier quantities, shown only as an equal-unit-value proxy; or (3) WTO AGIMS in-quota imports combined with a separately validated total-import denominator for the exact quota, product, unit and period, shown like (2) only as a quantity-share/equal-unit-value proxy. A fill rate is quota use divided by quota capacity—it is not, by itself, the in-quota share of total imports. The official-data calculation criteria currently support 126 independent Swiss-customs-territory HS6 groupings from 370 TN8 observations; they are not asserted to be legal quota-pool utilization groups.
Official references: WTO Tariff Analysis Online help; WTO tariff-rate quota dataset; WTO Consolidated Tariff Schedules, Section 1B; the WTO tariff-quota explanation; and UNCTAD's AVE methodology, which uses progressively wider official import-unit-value evidence when tariff-line denominators are unavailable. TINA's donor median is a disclosed simulation-only extension for formulas whose legal unit cannot be matched to trade quantities.
The country tables use 22 product groups: ten Agricultural and twelve Non-agricultural groups. These presentation groups are separate from the six-digit H4, H5 and H6 files described above.
Chronological record of changes to tariff sources, legal validation, classifications and AVE calculations.